Gender equity is the process of giving women and men the resources that they need to succeed in life. Gender equity recognises the diversity of disadvantage experienced by women and directs resources accordingly in order to reach equality.
As of May 2017, Australia’s national gender pay gap stands at 15.3%, with women in full-time work earning on average $251.20 less per week than men1.
In the SMR, we consistently see gender inequality based on employment type between women and men, with higher rates of women employed on a part-time basis, while a very small percentage of men are employed on a part-time basis. ABS census data from 2011 demonstrated that Mornington Peninsula and Bayside had the highest gender inequality in the region with 50% of women in part-time work compared to only 20% of men in these LGAs.
When looking at 2011 census data relating to full-time employment we again see gender inequality. Port Phillip remained the only LGA in the SMR where women employed full-time ranked above the state average, demonstrating the lowest inequality in full-time employment in our region (66% females vs 79% of males). This was followed closely by Stonnington2.
ABS census data from 2016 demonstrated clear gender inequality in the proportion of women and men who earn below the minimum weekly wage (that is, $0 -$649 pw) across the SMR. In our region, the proportion of women earning below the minimum weekly wage was consistently higher than men. There were six LGAs in which the proportion of women earning below the minimum weekly wage exceeded the state average.
Across the SMR, the largest proportion of our population is aged between 25 and 44 years with females and males across the region accounting for between 20% and 22% of the population, respectively. Applying a gendered lens, we know that in Victoria women are particularly at risk of violence aged between 15 and 50 years of age3.
The indicators measure a mother’s health, wellbeing of her children, her education, the family’s economic status and SES.
In 2016, SMR ranked 39.8 above the state average of 22.14. However, when we look at ranking per LGA we can see varying degrees of advantage and disadvantage.
Gender disparities are consistently seen across Australian workplaces, such as the disparity between men and women in leadership roles. This perpetuates existing stereotypes about the role of women, both at work and in wider society, and exacerbates gender pay inequality5.
In 2016, only three of 10 mayors were female. City of Port Phillip was the only LGA in the SMR with a female CEO. Women were also underrepresented as councillors across all LGA’s6.
Women are also unrepresented in executive, general management and legislator positions across the SMR.
One in three Australian women will experience physical violence and one in five women over the age of 15 will experience sexual violence at some stage in their lifetime7.
Within the SMR there are pockets of disadvantage wherein we see both high and lower rates of violence in varying LGAs. However, looking at SMR as a whole, we continue to see an increase in rates of violence from 2009 to 20158, reflective of wider state trends. Although Police call-outs to family violence incidents in the SMR have doubled over the last decade (as indicated by the data), we can also see that in the last two years, there has been a slight drop to these statistics in some areas.
Within the SMR, several LGAs scored quite low when replying to the question “How safe do you feel walking alone in the local area by night?” Casey, Frankston and Greater Dandenong fared worst with most female participants answering that they Did Not Feel safe walking alone at night in the local area. Six out of the 10 municipalities within the SMR scored below the state average of 63.1%. In contrast, females in the municipalities of Bayside (71.8%), Port Phillip (71.9%), Mornington Peninsula (67.8%) and Stonnington (69%) scored higher when answering the same question9.
The SMR also has some of the highest rates of sexual offences against women amongst all Metropolitan LGAs. In fact, Frankston and Dandenong are in the top three LGAs for sexual offences during 20179.
|Sexual offences (per 10,000)||Female||Male|
For the first time at a state level, the link between PVAW and SRH has been formally made. Family and gender-based violence can create barriers to women’s right to safely access appropriate SRH care services including timely access to contraception and fertility services10.
The strategy also identifies that ‘sexual and reproductive health is critically influenced by sex and gender norms, roles, expectations and power dynamics11. Societal norms place responsibility for contraception on women. This means that young women are more likely to believe that they hold responsibility for condom use and managing any risks associated with sex12. In addition, women often face stigma attached to casual sexual practices, whereas for men this behaviour is normalised and accepted. This stigma can have implications for women accessing SRH services13.
WHISE recognises that women have been disproportionately affected by poorer sexual and reproductive health.
As the report “Common Threads” reveals, “while SRH involves biological difference between the sexes, it is also influenced by social interactions such as gender relations, power differentials and economic and cultural factors”14.
Through a mapping of SRH services in the region, WHISE has found that women lacked information and access to contraception.
Have you identified an increase or decrease in the following needs from your clients of the past year?
WHISE has identified a number of issues of unmet service provision or requiring attention. 59% of organisations who responded to WHISE 2018 Service Mapping research stated that they were unable to appropriately provide SRH services for specific unmet needs.
Throughout Australia, high levels of STIs continue to occur. There is often misinformation or misunderstanding about the impact or health consequences of STIs. Throughout the SMR, high rates of STIs were identified, in line with national trends. In particular, high rates of Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, and Hepatitis B were found present amongst a number of municipalities in the SMR.
The SMR has some of the highest rates of Chlamydia found in Victoria (see below). Within the SMR, six out of the 10 LGAs have rates higher than the State average for Chlamydia. Chlamydia has been steadily rising since 2010 despite a small drop in 2012. While the rates of Chlamydia in men are also high in comparison to the State average, women maintain higher rates in all 10 LGAs in the SMR15
Greater Dandenong, Stonnington and Port Phillip have higher rates of Hepatitis B than the State average. Greater Dandenong has the highest rate of Hepatitis B in the SMR16.
Port Phillip and Stonnington have rates of Gonorrhoea almost eight times higher than the state average. These rates are most likely due to the historically high rates of LGTBIQA+ individuals living in those two municipalities17.
Low participation in Pap Screening is found in Cardinia, Casey, Frankston and Greater Dandenong. These four municipalities are below the state average of 60% participation with Frankston having only 54% participation rate
Several LGAs have low HPV immunisation rates for 14 year-old females (see below). As research has revealed, “the HPV vaccine has significantly lowered the risk of HPV-related cancers for thousands of women around the world”18.
|LGA||Coverage Dose 1||Coverage Dose 2||Coverage Dose 3|
|All SMR LGA’s||88.9%||85.6%||79.1%|
Port Phillip and Stonnington have a HIV rate five (5) times higher than the state average; particularly amongst its male population (see below). These two LGAs have a high LGBTIQ+ population as well as a transient community of travellers.
The link between the ability to make choices about SRH and literacy is significant. An informed choice cannot be made without having access to “comprehensive and reliable sexual and reproductive health information. Information needs to be transparent and accessible, particularly for disadvantaged women”19.
Access to a wide range of information in a variety of languages may not exist or be limited to only specific languages. Competency and confidence in seeking out SRH information may also be challenging for some women. For other women, cultural barriers may exist preventing them from fully accessing information and support. These challenges may limit women’s ability to make the most appropriate choices for themselves.
It is noteworthy to remember that health literacy encompasses more than just ‘educating’ or empowering individuals but that it is also about ensuring health providers and organisations are able to appropriately communicate and disseminate information with individuals from a range of settings.